🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a draft bill that include decreasing the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with health policies. Recently, international health experts issued a warning that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of business advocacy everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be decreased to less than half “following international recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum one year after the bill passes.

The WHO in fact recommends a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for various offences “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We live in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “The company operates its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Moreover, the corporation engages in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The company was “not against rules”, the representative commented, adding that underage people should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to accomplish desired public health goals, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which encompasses increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.