The Renowned Filmmaker on His Monumental American Revolution Film Series: ‘We Won’t Work on a More Important Film’
The acclaimed documentarian has evolved into more than a filmmaker; he represents an institution, a one-man industrial complex. Whenever he releases project arriving on the television, all desire an interview.
He participated in “more fucking podcasts than I ever thought possible”, he says, nearing the end of his marathon promotional journey comprising numerous locations, 80 screenings and hundreds of interviews. “With podcasts numbering in the hundreds of millions, I feel I’ve participated in a substantial portion.”
Thankfully the filmmaker is incredibly dynamic, as loquacious behind the mic as he is accomplished while filmmaking. At seventy-two has gone everywhere from historical sites to popular podcasts to talk about his latest monumental work: The American Revolution, a comprehensive multi-part historical examination that consumed a substantial portion of his recent years and premiered currently through the public broadcasting service.
Timeless Filmmaking Method
Similar to traditional cooking in today’s rapid-consumption era, The American Revolution is defiantly traditional, more redolent of The World at War than the era of online content and podcast series.
But for Burns, whose entire filmography documenting American historical narratives covering diverse cultural topics, the revolutionary period is not just another subject but foundational. “As I mentioned to directing partner Sarah Botstein during our discussions, and she shared this view: we won’t work on a more important film Burns contemplates from his New York base.
Comprehensive Scholarly Work
Burns and his collaborators along with writer Geoffrey Ward referenced numerous historical volumes plus archival documents. Multiple academic experts, representing diverse viewpoints, provided on-air commentary together with prominent academics representing multiple disciplines including slavery, Native American history plus colonial history.
Signature Documentary Style
The documentary’s methodology will appear similar to viewers of Burns’ earlier work. The unique approach incorporated methodical photographic exploration over historical images, extensive employment of contemporary scores and actors reading diaries, letters and speeches.
Those projects established Burns built his legacy; years later, currently the elder statesman of documentary filmmaking, he can attract virtually any performer. Appearing alongside Burns at a New York gathering, the Hamilton creator Lin-Manuel Miranda observed: “A call from Ken Burns commands immediate acceptance.”
All-Star Cast
The lengthy creation process also helped regarding scheduling. Sessions happened in studios, in relevant places using online technology, an approach adopted throughout the health crisis. The director describes working with Josh Brolin, who scheduled a brief window during his travels to perform his role as George Washington prior to departing to his next engagement.
Additional performers feature Kenneth Branagh, Hugh Dancy, Claire Danes, respected performing veterans, emerging and established stars, multiple generations of actors, Samuel L Jackson, Michael Keaton, Tracy Letts, British and American talent, skilled dramatic performers, Wendell Pierce, Matthew Rhys, Liev Schreiber, plus additional notable names.
Burns adds: “Frankly, this may be the best single cast recruited for any project. Their work is exceptional. They’re not picked because they’re celebrities. It irritated me when questioned, regarding the famous participants. I responded, ‘These are performers.’ They’re the finest actors in the world and they animate historical material.”
Historical Complexity
Nevertheless, the lack of surviving participants, modern media forced Burns and his team to lean heavily on primary texts, combining personal accounts of multiple revolutionary participants. This allowed them to show spectators not only to the “bold-faced names” of the revolution but also to “dozens of others who are seminal to the story”, several participants lack visual representation.
Burns also indulged his individual interest for geography and cartography. “Maps fascinate me,” he comments, “featuring increased geographical representation in this film than in all the other films across my complete filmography.”
Global Significance
The production crew recorded across multiple important places throughout the continent and British sites to preserve geographical atmosphere and worked extensively with historical interpreters. Various aspects converge to present a narrative more bloody, multifaceted and world-changing than the one taught in schools.
The documentary argues, was no mere parochial quarrel over land, taxation and representation. Instead the film portrays a brutal conflict that finally engaged multiple global powers and unexpectedly manifested described as “the noble aspirations of humankind”.
Civil War Reality
Initial complaints and protests aimed at the crown by American colonists in 13 fractious colonies soon descended into a brutal civil conflict, dividing communities and households and neighbour against neighbour. During the second installment, scholar Alan Taylor notes: “The primary misunderstanding regarding the Revolutionary War is that it was something a unifying experience for colonists. It leaves out the reality that it was a civil war among Americans.”
Sophisticated Interpretation
For him, the revolutionary narrative that “typically suffers from excessive romance and nostalgia and remains shallow and fails to properly acknowledge for what actually took place, and all the participants and the widespread bloodshed.”
The historian argues, a movement that announced the revolutionary principle of the unalienable rights of people; a vicious internal conflict, dividing revolutionaries and royalists; plus an international conflict, the fourth in a series of wars between imperial nations for the “prize of North America”.
Contingent Historical Events
The filmmaker also sought {to rediscover the