🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed decision, the nation's top court permitted Texas to implement a redrawn congressional district plan that could add as many as five new GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 ruling, issued on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to overturn a district court's ruling that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disturbing the sensitive federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its action.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters by their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had ordered the state to revert to the districts established after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's decision. She argued that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its opinion was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The ruling occurs during a countrywide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Usually, redistricting occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that might create several additional conservative seats. The opposition, for their part, have responded with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general welcomed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees representation supportive of Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

Conversely, opposition party officials lamented the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

Another leading House figure said the court had once again eroded its legitimacy by upholding a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.