🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers introduced a new playlist titled Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option resembles the standard Breakthrough format but includes a few notable adjustments:

• Every squad includes only 8 human participants, with the remaining filled by 32 bots.
• Activities performed by human gamers award full XP, while bot actions offer lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Features like Dogtags, achievements, and career stat updates have been turned off.

So essentially, the playlist lives up to its name: it's a casual version of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume there's nothing wrong, as it provides additional choices for players looking for alternative methods to enjoy the title. However, if video games have taught us anything, it's that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, many Battlefield 6 fans are mad.

Community Responses: Anger to Praise

"People want real players. Don't repeat the errors of your rivals," states a response to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking idea," says another. Meanwhile, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user remarks, "It's unclear where we are going with this title," while someone else lists all the issues they believe to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, there are players sharing how much they're liking the new mode. "It's very fun to practice, human participants keep it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "The community doesn't understand that there are players who have lives and don't play this game all the time. Allow them to strike a balance," states a different comment. A response via social media explains that as they're "a parent gamer with limited time, this is perfect for me," while another praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Concerns and Community Feedback

All that said, players have valid points to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have pointed out that it will make queue times more extended for different playlists due to the sheer number of options currently available. Similarly, some areas often face AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears a little backwards that the mode does not begin without a required amount of real players, despite it primarily centers on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, one of the biggest complaints is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide complete rewards, even against bots, but that was removed when they attempted to remove XP farming from the system. Thus Casual Breakthrough feels like the player base compromising in the middle, according to forum feedback. Another describes this addition as the devs "making a mistake significantly, I experienced so much fun in the initial release, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Occur?

Should Battlefield Studios has proven anything so far with the latest installment, it is that they're listening and acting on player input. Tasks being too difficult got fixed very quickly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data shows this recent mode is underperforming to their expectations, they won't be shy to change it again.